?

Log in

No account? Create an account
February 25th, 2004 - LiveJournal Development — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
LiveJournal Development

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

February 25th, 2004

Bot policy [Feb. 25th, 2004|12:26 am]
LiveJournal Development

lj_dev

[bradfitz]
Barring major, well-founded objections, I'm going to enforcing a new policy on bots that scrape the site (userinfo/FOAF/fdata/etc).

The policy is:

If you're scraping, your useragent string must include a contact email. (And ideally a URL of the project)

For instance:

http://fooland.com/ljtoy.html; bob@fooland.com

I'd like to be very bot-friendly, but that requires bots be friendly back.

I'd also like to get up a URL ($LJHOME/bots/ ?) which explains:

-- the rules (user agent, rates)
-- what we provide in machine-readable format
-- who to contact for other access

Then when we block a new bot that hasn't read the rules, the block message will include:

"You've been banned because you seem to be a new bot. Please read the bot rules at $LJHOME/bots/ and contact us to get unblocked."

Sound acceptable?

Please pass word in relevant communities: lj_clients, lj_research, etc. (I don't follow everything.)
link27 comments|post comment

THis isn't supposed to be a rant or anything... [Feb. 25th, 2004|11:58 am]
LiveJournal Development

lj_dev

[fallen_x_ashes]
[mood |thoughtfulthoughtful]

And I know the comments are being made anonymously, so this doesn't bring us back to the LJ Code thing at all...

but...


If LJ truthfully has the capability to protect us from Comment Spam? Why are the "Passion of Christ" bots still roaming the site? Just curious.
link25 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | February 25th, 2004 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]