?

Log in

No account? Create an account
February 24th, 2003 - LiveJournal Development — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
LiveJournal Development

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

February 24th, 2003

Bazaar Update [Feb. 24th, 2003|10:48 am]
LiveJournal Development

lj_dev

[bradfitz]
Be sure to list your contributions for the Bazaar session. It'll be closing sometime on Friday.

http://www.livejournal.com/bazaar/status.bml?bzid=1

Being Monday (primary inbox cleaning day), I'll be applying a bunch Zilla patches. After your patch goes in, go add the contribution.
link2 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Feb. 24th, 2003|07:07 pm]
LiveJournal Development

lj_dev

[csogilvie]
here
User: csogilvie - Colin S. Ogilvie
Category: Code/Programming (view all)
Description: Partial contribution to patch to show detailed RSS error messages.
URL: http://zilla.livejournal.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341
Date Added: 2003-02-17 13:43:16
# Acks: 0

Acknowlegements
This contribution has been acknowledged by the following other contributors:

* bradfitz


I think theres something up with contributors.bml - It seems to be doing it for some and not others. Anyone else seeing this?

I'm working on changes to contributors.bml ATM so if its a bug, i'll fix it then unless its done before then. (also see here)
link8 comments|post comment

Zilla bugs & Contributions [Feb. 24th, 2003|09:26 pm]
LiveJournal Development

lj_dev

[timwi]
I have seen various people adding comments to Zilla bugs after they are resolved linking to their contribution, some of them also asking people to acknowledge them.

Brad, what is your thought about this? Personally, I find it rather annoying. I'm sure we can trust that proper contributions are acknowledged; I don't think contributors should need to draw extra attention to them.

Or is there a serious reason to believe contributions won't get acked otherwise?


On an unrelated note, I have a question about Zilla. When someone marks a bug as a duplicate, I get two mails - one for the bug that was resolved as a duplicate, and one for the bug it was marked a duplicate of. So far, this is correct. However, shouldn't that latter mail contain only this information? Sometimes I see an address being added to the CC list within that e-mail, and I'm wondering how that is possible and whether that might be a bug.
link10 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | February 24th, 2003 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]